Auto Amazon Links: No products found.
Campaigners are raising alarms over the potential threats to England’s ancient woodlands amid government plans to build 1.5 million new homes by 2029. Despite existing protections that restrict construction in or near these habitats to “wholly exceptional circumstances,” concerns have grown that recent policy shifts could undermine these safeguards. The introduction of the “grey belt,” land designated for development from previously protected open spaces, has intensified worries that ancient woodlands might be increasingly encroached upon.
While the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government maintains that ancient woodlands still enjoy robust protections, investigations have uncovered numerous development proposals situated dangerously close to these sensitive areas. One example includes approved plans for 450 homes near Hook Wood in Gillingham, Kent, which local residents fear will severely disrupt native wildlife. Lucy Graebe-Watson, chair of Ancient Woodland UK, highlighted that existing protections are straining under the pressure of newer planning reforms and voiced growing concerns raised by community groups.
In Derby’s East Midlands region, the edges of Chaddesden Wood Nature Reserve face threats from plans for approximately 150 new homes. Long-time resident Helen Cherry, who has lived nearby for four decades, described the ancient woodland—home to mature hazel and oak trees—as a precious natural space that would be surrounded by housing if development proceeds. She emphasized the emotional connection locals have to the site and argued that the construction would undermine the reserve’s protected status by enclosing it on all sides. Despite Derby City Council rejecting the proposal in 2025, the presence of surveyors has fueled fears that developers may return with altered plans. The developer, JGP Properties Limited, asserted their assessments found no harm to the ancient woodland or veteran trees.
Environmental organizations echo the unease over current protections, considering the loopholes that planning policies create. The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds’ Carl Bunnage acknowledged improvements in habitat protections but described the allowance for development under “wholly exceptional circumstances” as a potential exploit for developers, especially in housing-shortage areas. He questioned why irreplaceable natural habitats do not receive protection comparable to that given to historic buildings. Community opposition also exists in South Yorkshire near Gelster Wood, where a proposed 130-home development has sparked campaigns involving thousands of residents concerned about losing centuries-old farmland and about possible increased flooding due to loss of natural drainage. Ecological consultants warn that construction can harm ancient woodlands even without tree removal, through effects on roots, water supply, and pollution, while developers maintain any future planning would adhere to environmental regulations.
Government representatives emphasized that national planning policies strictly oppose developments leading to loss or damage to ancient woodlands, with only narrow exceptions reserved for nationally significant infrastructure projects subject to compensation requirements. The recent revision of the National Planning Policy Framework sought to clarify policies regarding irreplaceable habitats, but campaigners remain vigilant about the future impacts of housing targets on these precious natural sites
Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More
Auto Amazon Links: No products found.