Auto Amazon Links: No products found.
The High Court has been hearing a legal challenge regarding the secretary of state’s decision to prohibit the Drumcree parade, a move made based on security advice. Central to the case is intelligence from the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI), which suggests that dissident republicans might have considered using firearms against police officers had the parade been allowed to proceed along the Garvaghy Road. A lawyer representing a member of the Orange Order presented this intelligence, highlighting concerns about potential violence from within the protestors.
Among the intelligence reports, it was conveyed that loyalist paramilitaries were showing signs of frustration. The lawyer emphasized that it was “almost certain” dissidents were among the demonstrators and “possible” that they had access to guns, which could have been used in attacks against police. There were also indications that petrol bombs might have been deployed if police had attempted to remove protesters by force. Moreover, the intelligence suggested mainstream republicans were worried about their ability to control dissident elements and prevent disorder. The material referenced included nine intelligence documents, one notably titled “feelings of PIRA.”
On behalf of Chief Constable Jon Boutcher, a lawyer explained that the PSNI believed all viable and proportionate measures to facilitate the parade had been thoroughly explored. Any effort to oversee the parade would likely have required significant public order interventions, posing an “unacceptable risk” of severe and extended unrest, with potential spill-over effects. Boutcher’s request for intervention by Secretary of State Sir Chris was grounded in operational policing concerns and was described as free from any legal errors. The lawyer stressed that Boutcher was simply informing the Secretary of State of the seriousness of the situation, rather than making speculative claims, asserting, “No-one is saying he woke up one morning and imagined all these potential consequences. These are real life consequences everybody was thinking of.”
Further testimony introduced another aspect of the PSNI intelligence, which noted it was “highly likely” that more loyalists would gather in the Portadown area, with disorder at Drumcree Church remaining a possibility due to both sides converging on the location. This case had been due to start the previous week but was delayed after the Orange Order included the chief constable in the proceedings. The challenge is brought by a Portadown Orangeman against Sir Chris and Chief Constable Boutcher following a two-week stand-off when protesters blocked the parade route. Boutcher has warned the parade could have led to grave disorder with devastating consequences for Stormont and the peace process. However, the applicant contends that Boutcher improperly considered “wholly political” factors irrelevant to policing in his advice, which compromised the secretary of state’s decision. Allegations have also been made that Sir Chris displayed “scatter gun decision-making,” misdirected himself, and failed by treating the lawful parade and unlawful protest with equal weight. Mr Justice Scoffield, presiding over the case, indicated that a prompt ruling would be issued either later in the week or the following week, with hearings set to resume on Tuesday
Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More
Auto Amazon Links: No products found.