Auto Amazon Links: No products found. Blocked by captcha.
The Cabinet Office has attributed the accidental release of official documents mentioning Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor to an “administrative error.” These documents, which originated from No 10 files dated 2004 and 2005, pertained to royal visits overseas and were part of the government’s annual transfer of records to the National Archives under the 20-year rule. The files were briefly accessible to journalists before being withdrawn.
Initially, the embargoed version of the documents contained minutes detailing the overseas travel of various members of the royal family, including the then-Duke of York, who served as the UK trade envoy at the time. However, before the public release of the file at the National Archives in Kew, west London, mentions of the Duke’s travels were redacted. The Cabinet Office, responsible for transferring such files, stated that these documents were never intended for public release and emphasized that all records undergo meticulous reviews in accordance with the Public Records Act.
Critics from anti-monarchy groups have disputed the withholding of these papers, especially in light of the Duke of York’s subsequent loss of royal titles due to his association with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, allegations the Duke has consistently denied. Graham Smith, the chief executive of the campaign group Republic, remarked, “The royals are one of the most secretive institutions in the UK. These documents should be released without fear or favour, to allow the public to make informed judgements about the royals.” Journalists who viewed the minutes before their removal noted that the content appeared largely routine, outlining the Duke’s trade envoy travel plans, including visits to China, Russia, Southeast Asia, and Spain.
Additional released files provide insight into broader Foreign Office considerations, revealing that military intervention to oust Zimbabwean leader Robert Mugabe was ruled out despite growing frustration within Tony Blair’s government. A 2004 options paper described such an intervention as politically isolated, expensive, and lacking a clear exit plan, dismissing it as an unviable strategy. The documents portrayed Mugabe as “depressingly healthy” at age 80 and determined to shape the country’s succession according to his preferences. The papers also disclose an incident in 1994 when Downing Street issued an apology after John Major’s birthday telegram to the Queen Mother was sent in an “improper manner,” though the files do not specify the nature of the error. Officials suggested that telegrams might be a flawed form of communication and proposed their discontinuation.
Moreover, the newly declassified records highlight the constraints of the Freedom of Information Act. Officials declined to disclose details of a conversation between then-Prime Minister Blair and French President Jacques Chirac following Princess Diana’s death in 1997, arguing that revealing private discussions between world leaders would undermine candid diplomatic exchanges. While papers regarding Diana’s death and funeral were made public, the summary memo of Blair and Chirac’s talk was withheld as being “fundamentally not in the public interest.” The documents also reveal ambitious, though ultimately abandoned, plans under Blair for a substantial redevelopment of Downing Street. Proposed in March 2005, the project, codenamed Project George, envisioned a major overhaul of the estate, some portions of which dated back to the 17th century. Plans included a two-storey underground suite beneath the No 10 garden with a 200-seat conference room that could serve as a secure refuge in the event of a terror attack, as well as an underground service road to keep VIP visitors separate from refuse collections. Further additions were to include a new staff entrance, a café, and recreational facilities in the basement. The existing infrastructure was described as failing, with sewers, power, and IT systems deemed unreliable. The extensive project would have extended to Nos 11 and 12 Downing Street and 70 Whitehall, which houses the Cabinet Office, with proposed new glass-fronted extensions and blast-resistant windows. However, the files do not clarify why these redevelopment plans were ultimately scrapped
Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More
Auto Amazon Links: No products found. Blocked by captcha.