Auto Amazon Links: No products found. Blocked by captcha.
In a repeat of last year, the prime minister has once again made the decision to oust some of his MPs from the Parliamentary Labour Party this July. Last year, shortly after winning the general election, seven Labour MPs had the whip removed for voting against the two-child benefit cap. Now, a year later, as MPs were gearing up for Parliament’s summer break, the prime minister has taken action once more.
This time, four MPs have had the party whip removed, forcing them to sit as independents in the House of Commons. Additionally, three other Labour MPs have been stripped of their trade envoy roles. The move last summer was intended to serve as a deterrent for future rebellions, but recent benefits-related rebellions have shown that defiance persists among some Labour MPs.
The MPs who were dismissed were called in individually to meet with the Chief Whip Sir Alan Campbell, while the trade envoys were informed of their removal over the phone. Despite feeling emotional and devastated, there is a sense of defiance among the dismissed MPs, with some describing the actions as ridiculous, petty, and vindictive. The timing of these suspensions is seen as a preemptive measure to prevent any potential future rebellions from gaining traction.
As the government seeks to assert its authority and prevent further dissent, reactions among Labour MPs vary. Some believe that loyalty to the Labour party should take precedence, while others view the dismissals as public executions. The decision to remove the trade envoys has sparked criticism, with some questioning the rationale behind the dismissals and the impact it may have on morale within the party. Despite efforts to foster better relationships with MPs, the prime minister’s approach to discipline remains a point of contention within the party
Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More
Auto Amazon Links: No products found. Blocked by captcha.