MI5 misled watchdog about neo-Nazi spy case after lying in court

MI5 misled watchdog about neo-Nazi spy case after lying in court

Sir Brian Leveson, the Investigatory Powers Commissioner responsible for overseeing MI5’s activities, found himself entangled in a web of deception after the Security Service provided false information leading to the rewriting of a report. The Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office (IPCO) initially had a draft report contradicting MI5’s false evidence, but the final version failed to uphold that contradiction. IPCO admitted to being misled by MI5, prompting an apology from MI5 director general Sir Ken McCallum following the BBC’s challenge to the Security Service’s deceitful statements in court.

This revelation showcased how MI5 had potentially misled various organizations and courts in this particular case by providing false evidence. The incident also raised concerns about IPCO’s willingness to accept false information from MI5, considering its role in ensuring the Security Service’s adherence to the law and public interest. IPCO’s clandestine investigation into MI5’s handling of a violent neo-Nazi agent, known as Agent X, began in 2022 following a BBC expose on the agent’s coercion and terrorizing activities.

MI5 found itself locked in a dispute with IPCO over the disclosure of Agent X’s status as a covert human intelligence source (CHIS) during interactions with the media. Despite MI5’s denial of any departure from the non-disclosure policy, IPCO’s evidence suggested otherwise. MI5’s refusal to retract its stance led to the alteration of IPCO’s final report, introducing three significant falsehoods that downplayed the breach of NCND policy regarding Agent X’s status. The discord culminated in MI5’s eventual apology in court and the acknowledgment of errors in handling the case.

Despite MI5’s internal review attributing the false evidence to mistakes and poor record-keeping, the incident underscored a critical failure in maintaining accurate documentation. IPCO, in its recent annual report, highlighted the ongoing scrutiny of the case involving Agent X due to the developments that unfolded during the investigation. The episode shed light on the intricacies of oversight and accountability within the realm of intelligence operations, emphasizing the delicate balance between transparency and security in such scenarios

Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More