The government has failed to conduct a comprehensive review of the winter fuel cuts, but a limited “equalities analysis” has been conducted and released following a freedom of information request. Officials from the Work and Pensions Department compiled the analysis, which suggested that some of society’s most vulnerable might still lose out on payments. While 100,000 more pensioners are expected to apply for Pension Credit and retain their winter fuel payment, the analysis anticipated that over 750,000 eligible pensioners would still fail to apply due to the nature of the cuts. It is expected that the over 80s will suffer the largest financial hit from the cuts.
The Conservative party has called on the government to commission and publish a full impact statement of the cuts in response to the report, which it considered “shocking”. Additionally, some of Sir Keir Starmer’s colleagues expressed concerns, calling it “shocking”. The MPs also said it was “clearly morally required” to conduct an assessment of the cuts and expressed disappointment that no assessment had been carried out. However, some MPs have been reluctant to criticise the government publicly, as they hope to persuade the Chancellor to agree to some modification in next month’s budget. This has been attributed to the Conservative party’s monitoring of dissenting voices.
The Treasury is yet to offer any indication that it will go beyond extending the Household Support Fund, costing £421m, until next April. MPs are apprehensive and say the government is leaving a poor impression on voters who have switched to Labour. Many, however, have accepted Rachel Reeves’ argument that in-year welfare cuts were necessary due to the state of public finances and that aid should be targeted at the most vulnerable. In a statement to the BBC, a Treasury spokesman said that over a million pensioners would receive a payment this year and that the focus was now on ensuring that eligible citizens were receiving the required support.
The Labour party’s willingness to make difficult choices has come with a political price tag, the Winter Fuel Payment cut. The government has yet to conduct a proper evaluation of the implications of the cut, with only a limited impact report released, which sparked concern among Conservative and Labour MPs alike. Some MPs have been reluctant to speak out publicly on the matter, for fear of inciting Conservative Party monitoring, while others continue to vocally push for a more comprehensive impact analysis or, alternatively, hope to modify the initial proposal’s effect on citizens through negotiation in the upcoming budget meeting. Although the Treasury has extended more than £400m to support citizens to date, Winter Fuel Payment cut implications remain ever-present.
Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More
