The UK government’s decision to commit to military action is a significant moment for Prime Minister Rishi Sunak during his time in office. Although the government has the prerogative to make such decisions without wider political consultation, the cabinet, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, Shadow Defence Secretary John Healey, and Speaker of the House of Commons Sir Lindsay Hoyle were briefed before any strikes began.
The briefing is not only a courtesy, but a necessary step given the scepticism about British military operations from parliament and beyond. The prime minister’s statement alluded to the necessity of limited, proportionate action in self-defence. However, the government is likely to face calls to elaborate on its objectives and costs, given the potential risks associated with this action.
The decision has already been criticised by several political parties, including the Scottish National Party, the Liberal Democrats, and Plaid Cymru, who have argued that parliament has been bypassed. Diplomatically, geopolitically, militarily and economically, there are both risks associated with taking action and doing nothing. As such, unknown consequences abound, particularly in light of the war in Ukraine and the Covid pandemic.
Overall, this landmark moment highlights the fragility and complexity of navigating international conflict, requiring careful consideration of the risks and benefits of all possible courses of action
Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More