Laura Kuenssberg: Is Andy Burnham Labour’s saviour, or just its best bet?

Laura Kuenssberg: Is Andy Burnham Labour’s saviour, or just its best bet?

When approaching the topic of Andy Burnham, a senior Labour contact quipped, “Do you want a chat about the saviour?” This nickname captures the growing anticipation surrounding the Greater Manchester mayor, who is set to enter Number 10 Downing Street within the coming month. Just ten days ago, Burnham secured a notable victory in the Makerfield by-election, a contest once described by a former minister as akin to “Russian roulette.” Despite Labour’s general unpopularity, Burnham managed to defeat Reform and defy expectations. Now, the pressing question is whether he can succeed at a far greater scale and truly embody the leadership Labour so desperately needs.

The enthusiasm within Labour circles for Burnham’s leadership is palpable. On his first day back in Parliament, the crowd of Labour MPs surged to surround him for a large group photo in Westminster Hall. One MP remarked on the unusual atmosphere in Parliament that week, noting a scramble among colleagues to gain access to Burnham, while a government member observed ministers “sweating their connections” just to secure a meeting with him. Burnham’s appeal is more than superficial image or political posturing; there’s genuine hope that his popularity will help Labour not only defend seats but also retain a sizeable portion of its robust majority in the forthcoming 2024 general election.

Despite this optimism, Burnham’s transition from regional leader to national prime minister presents challenges. Critics warn he must evolve from being “cock of the north” to a “national champion,” mindful that the North is not synonymous with Manchester alone. One contact cautioned that positioning Manchester as the definitive representation of the North risks alienating people from cities like Leeds and Newcastle and overlooks broader regional and even Scottish identities. Nevertheless, Burnham has demonstrated an uncommon ability to engage directly with people, often taking time for conversations others might dismiss. An associate from his mayoral days recalled how Burnham’s tendency to be late was borne out of his commitment to dialogue, even if it meant lingering by the bus stop talking about public transit.

Burnham’s persona is characterized by warmth and approachability, earning him genuine affection among colleagues and constituents alike. Described as “affable” and “warm,” he is viewed by some MPs as a “good bloke” with significant social dexterity that serves him both in personal interactions and on social media. Yet concerns linger about whether personal likability is enough for the office of prime minister. Questions circulate about the depth of his policy thinking, with some wondering if he risks being seen as a “lightweight” when facing the relentless scrutiny of national leadership. One senior party figure bluntly predicted, “The eyelashes will deliver for a day, maybe a week. But the scrutiny is brutal. Won’t last three months, never mind three years.”

Burnham’s choice of James Purnell, his former flatmate and fellow New Labour cabinet member, as chief of staff signals a willingness to take bold, sometimes controversial decisions. Purnell’s perceived Blairite leanings have stirred unease among the party’s left wing, yet many interpret the appointment as a sign Burnham understands the need to make tough, potentially unpopular choices. This is a significant shift from the relatively insulated role of mayor, where trade-offs are less common. Insiders comment on Burnham’s affection for being liked and the emotional nature he brings to politics, raising questions about how he might balance personal sensitivities with the demands of ruthless political leadership. Nevertheless, Burnham’s history shows a determination not to take “no” for an answer. In his earlier governmental roles, he famously confronted resistant civil servants who were allegedly preserving resources for a future Tory administration, winning that battle against entrenched opposition.

Regarding policy specifics, Burnham’s agenda remains somewhat opaque. He has expressed dedication to themes of equality, community support, and economic partnership—drawing on his Manchester record, which includes public transport improvements, educational initiatives, and regional economic growth. His work on social care reform as health secretary, though stymied by political realities in 2010, points to unfinished business in that field. Together with Liverpool Mayor Steve Rotherham, Burnham co-authored a book proposing radical reforms such as guaranteed equal regional funding, a written constitution, proportional representation, abolition of party whips, and the expansion of devolution powers to local governments. The plan also calls for legally enshrined rights to essentials like housing and transparency laws requiring full disclosure from public officials. Yet, while ambitious, these ideas represent a long-term vision rather than an immediate policy blueprint.

Many are awaiting Burnham’s upcoming economic speech, hoping to glean clearer insight into his priorities. Some remain concerned about how he will handle pressing questions: finding necessary defense funding, enforcing or adjusting social media restrictions, reforming welfare, or managing immigration policies. His stance on foreign affairs is also unclear, though it is presumed he would largely maintain the current government’s positions. The timing of his takeover amidst global upheaval and domestic challenges—ranging from demographic shifts to economic debt and political disillusionment—means Burnham will face a testing environment from the outset. As one former colleague put it, he will have to confront “bloody awful issues” with difficult, potentially unpopular decisions, because “you can’t govern on

Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More