Victorians got Battle of Hastings wrong, professor says

Victorians got Battle of Hastings wrong, professor says

A fresh perspective on the iconic Battle of Hastings, one of England’s most renowned historical events, has been proposed by medieval history expert Professor Tom Licence from the University of East Anglia. His research challenges a long-standing narrative that Harold Godwinson’s troops marched over 200 miles on foot from Stamford Bridge in Yorkshire to the battlefield, suggesting instead that they traveled by sea. This reinterpretation questions a detail that was overlooked by historians in the 19th century and could reshape the way the conflict is understood.

The Battle of Hastings, which occurred on 14 October 1066 along the Sussex coast, marked the decisive moment when William the Conqueror defeated King Harold, securing the English throne. The event has inspired many cultural works, including the famous Bayeux Tapestry and a recent BBC drama series. Licence’s investigation revisits the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, a crucial historical source dating back to the 9th century and updated into the 12th century, uncovering a misreading that has been perpetuated since Victorian times. According to Licence, rather than a strenuous, hurried march on land, Harold’s forces utilized England’s naval capabilities to move strategically along the coast with a large fleet.

The idea of a desperate, heroic march across land is described by Licence as a Victorian invention, adding, “Harold was not a reactive, exhausted commander. He was a strategist using England’s naval assets to wage a coordinated defence.” He emphasizes that the operation was a sophisticated combination of land and sea maneuvers rather than a frantic slog. Importantly, his findings do not contradict any elements of the Bayeux Tapestry, which remains historically consistent. His work is set to be discussed further at an academic conference at the University of Oxford.

Commentators from both English Heritage and the British Museum have welcomed Licence’s research as an exciting development that highlights the importance of re-examining established historical ideas. Roy Porter of English Heritage praised the discovery for revealing “the immense value of testing received wisdom,” noting that Harold’s approach may have been more complex and calculated than previously believed. Meanwhile, Michael Lewis, curator of the upcoming Bayeux Tapestry exhibition in London, described Licence’s findings as a “fascinating discovery” that Harold chose a more logical sea route to confront William. This new insight is expected to encourage greater interest in viewing the tapestry during its display at the British Museum

Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More