Jury-free trials recommended to save courts from 'collapse'

Jury-free trials recommended to save courts from 'collapse'

In a bid to reduce the overwhelming backlog of cases in the criminal courts, recommendations have been put forward by former senior judge Sir Brian Leveson, suggesting that thousands of cases typically heard by juries should instead be decided by judges alone. With nearly 77,000 cases awaiting trial in the Crown Court in England and Wales, some defendants and victims are experiencing extensive delays as they wait years for their cases to be resolved. Sir Brian deemed the current situation “simply unacceptable” and advocated for fundamental reforms to prevent a potential collapse of the entire system, although some barristers argue that the presence of juries is crucial for ensuring fair justice.

To address the perceived shortcomings in the system, Sir Brian proposed various measures, such as conducting judge-only trials for specific cases like fraud and bribery, as well as increasing the use of out-of-court resolutions like cautions. He also suggested the establishment of a new division of the Crown Court comprising two magistrates and a judge to handle less serious offenses, and emphasized the importance of offering sentence reductions for guilty pleas at the first opportunity provided. The overarching goal of these recommendations is to expedite the legal process and alleviate the substantial backlog that currently exists.

If implemented, the proposals would result in a greater number of cases being heard in magistrates’ courts, while reserving jury trials for the most severe offenses. Offenses carrying a maximum custodial sentence of two years or less, such as drug possession and theft, could potentially receive reduced penalties, including imprisonment for 12 months or less. Additionally, defendants involved in cases concerning offenses like assaulting an emergency worker or possessing indecent images of children may no longer have the option to elect for a jury trial.

Despite the potential benefits of these suggested changes, not all legal professionals are in agreement. Mary Prior KC, chair of the Criminal Bar Association, highlighted the need for criminal barristers to support any fundamental alterations to the justice system, emphasizing the importance of seeking input from members. Meanwhile, Magistrates’ Association expressed support for the review, believing that the proposed reforms would expedite justice delivery for numerous individuals. As the government considers Sir Brian Leveson’s recommendations and prepares for legislative action in the coming months, the focus remains on driving essential changes to ensure a more efficient and effective criminal justice system

Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More