Sycamore Gap trial: What have jurors heard this week?

Sycamore Gap trial: What have jurors heard this week?

The trial surrounding the felling of the iconic Sycamore Gap tree has gripped audiences worldwide. The tree, which took well over a century to grow, was abruptly cut down in the darkness of night, sparking international outrage and condemnation. As the trial of two men accused of the crime unfolds in Newcastle Crown Court, here are some key points that have emerged during the proceedings.

Prosecutors allege that Daniel Graham, 39, and Adam Carruthers, 32, were responsible for the “moronic mission” of cutting down the tree. While one of them wielded a chainsaw to bring down the tree, the other filmed the act on Mr. Graham’s phone – a claim that both defendants vehemently deny. A video depicting the felling of the tree, recovered from Mr. Graham’s phone, was presented to jurors. When questioned by police about the video, Mr. Graham repeatedly refused to comment on how it ended up on his device.

The court heard expert testimony regarding the felling of the tree using a “hinge-and-wedge” technique, causing damage to the Roman wall. Evidence suggested that a large wedge cut from the trunk was taken by the defendants as a “trophy.” Despite forensic analysis linking the wedge to the Sycamore Gap tree, neither the wedge nor the chainsaw used in the act has been located by authorities.

Cell site analysis and automatic number plate recognition data presented in court indicated the accused individuals traveling from Carlisle to Sycamore Gap before and after the felling. Additionally, CCTV footage captured headlights moving towards the site of the incident, providing further evidence of the defendants’ presence in the area that night. Messages exchanged between the defendants and their associates also indicated their involvement in the events leading up to the felling of the tree.

Following the felling of the Sycamore Gap tree, the defendants were observed sharing social media posts and press reports about the incident on their phones. The court heard exchanges between the two men, indicating their awareness of the widespread outrage caused by their actions. Prosecutors highlighted how the defendants seemed to revel in the international attention garnered by the tree’s destruction, though their camaraderie would soon deteriorate as public sentiment turned against them. The trial continues with Daniel Graham providing testimony and Adam Carruthers yet to present his defense in court

Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More