scrutiny and demonstrated the complexities of these debates.
Some argue that these debates should be had, that they are essential to democracy and for the rights of all the involved parties to be properly protected.
Others see the discussions as damaging, as corrosive, as taking rights from one group and giving them to another.
Wherever one falls on this spectrum, with the Supreme Court judgement it is clear that these discussions are far from over.
Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More
