Judge 'deeply troubled' by PMQs exchange on Gazans settling in UK

Judge 'deeply troubled' by PMQs exchange on Gazans settling in UK

The recent comments made by Sir Keir Starmer and Kemi Badenoch on a judge’s ruling in an immigration case have caused concern among legal authorities. Lady Chief Justice Baroness Sue Carr expressed deep unease over the remarks, stating that they were unacceptable and conflicted with the duty of politicians to uphold the rule of law and respect the independent role of judges. The statements were made during a heated exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, where Badenoch criticized a decision to grant a Palestinian family the right to live in the UK under a scheme intended for Ukrainians.

In response to Badenoch’s criticism, Sir Keir agreed that the decision was incorrect, emphasizing that it should be Parliament, not judges, making the rules on immigration. However, Lady Chief Justice Baroness Sue Carr highlighted that judges’ concerns about personal security were at an all-time high, with attacks on social media fueled by misinformation. She underscored the importance of respecting and protecting the independence of the judiciary, urging parties to address disagreements through the appellate process.

Baroness Carr’s comments prompted a response from Badenoch, who defended the right of politicians to discuss critical public matters in Parliament without compromising judicial independence. She called for a fundamental overhaul of flawed human rights laws, emphasizing the government’s commitment to tightening rules where necessary. Acknowledging concerns over judge safety, Baroness Carr stressed the importance of understanding the facts and law before criticizing judgments, noting that judges act independently and deserve better than unwarranted attacks.

The disagreement at PMQs exemplified the delicate balance between legislative and judicial roles in the UK’s legal system. Lady Chief Justice Baroness Sue Carr’s stance serves as a reminder of the essential need to uphold the rule of law, protect judicial independence, and ensure respectful dialogue between branches of government. As debates on immigration and human rights continue, the importance of informed, constructive discussions remains key to addressing complex legal issues

Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More