Auto Amazon Links: No products found. Blocked by captcha.
Authors Zoe Kleinman and Liv McMahon reported on the UK and US’s decision to not sign an international agreement on artificial intelligence (AI) at the global summit in Paris. The agreement was signed by numerous countries, including France, China, and India, committing to an “open”, “inclusive”, and “ethical” approach to AI development. The UK government cited concerns about national security and “global governance” as reasons for not adding its name to the agreement.
US Vice President JD Vance shared his perspective at the summit, cautioning against too much regulation of AI which he believed could hinder the industry’s growth. He emphasized the importance of prioritizing “pro-growth AI policies” over safety measures. This stance appeared to conflict with French President Emmanuel Macron’s position, who advocated for increased regulation to advance AI technology.
The UK, previously seen as a champion of AI safety, jeopardized its credibility by not signing the Paris communique, according to Andrew Dudfield, head of AI at Full Fact. Despite criticisms, UKAI, a trade body representing AI businesses, supported the government’s decision. UKAI’s chief executive, Tim Flagg, raised concerns about balancing environmental responsibility with the energy needs of the AI industry.
The agreement signed by 60 countries outlined goals to reduce digital disparities, promote AI accessibility, and ensure transparent, safe, and trustworthy development of the technology. It also addressed concerns about AI energy usage, which experts warned could escalate to rival that of small countries in the future. While some unidentified parts of the agreement were contested by the UK government, it emphasized its commitment to other agreements on sustainability and cybersecurity at the summit
Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More
Auto Amazon Links: No products found. Blocked by captcha.