Should you be a peer? 150 words to explain why


A new rule has been introduced that mandates leaders of political parties to provide an explanation for their nominations for the House of Lords. The leaders are required to submit a 150-word summary that defends why the candidate was chosen. Upon successfully appointing a nominee, the statement will be published online. The measure has been enacted as a component of the government’s larger set of reforms to the Lords.

Cabinet Office minister Nick Thomas-Symonds announced the change, saying that it was included in the government’s overall agenda. The introduction of legislation to eliminate the ability of hereditary peers to serve in the Lords was significant, and it had already reached a critical point where legislative scrutiny had surpassed the halfway mark. Thomas-Symonds emphasized the administration’s eagerness to pass it into law.

Labour expressed a desire to “reform the appointments process to ensure the quality of new appointments” in their manifesto regarding the House of Lords. The manifesto went on to explain that since members are chosen for life, the chamber had become quite substantial. When Parliament is dissolved following a general election, party leaders may nominate people to enhance the number of peers they have.

In the dissolution honours last July, many individuals were nominated to become peers, including former prime minister Theresa May and former foreign secretary Margaret Beckett. Prime ministers also typically make resignation honours or name people to serve as ministers. When Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer took office, he appointed a number of peers as ministers, including Attorney General Richard Hermer. Gors are formally designated by the King, following the advice of the prime minister. The House of Lords Appointments Commission (HOLAC) oversees appointments and advises the prime minister on the suitability of candidates.

Recent years have seen a lot of criticism of nominations, primarily during Boris Johnson’s tenure. More than half of Johnson’s resignation nominations were refused on the grounds of propriety by HOLAC. Some of the choices that were approved faced negative evaluation, such as Charlotte Owen, a political adviser to Johnson, who became the youngest member at the age of 30. Johnson faced a lot of criticism for the appointment and described Baroness Owen’s treatment as “absolutely shameful” and sexist

Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More