Explaining the farming tax change row


A multitude of farmers have converged on Westminster in dissent of the proposed amendments to inheritance tax regulations unveiled in the latest budget. The new rules are set to come into effect by April 2026, and they will revoke the broad exemption previously afforded to inherited agricultural assets worth over £1m, subjecting them to a reduced tax rate of 20%. This is only half of the standard rate that would apply to all other types of inherited wealth.

The farmers who have amassed in protest have articulated their complaints that the latest tax alterations will have catastrophic consequences on their operations and businesses, with the farming industry narrowly surviving on meager profit margins. The farmers have contended that the available land being offered for work purposes is inadequately small and too dear, and any alteration which causes a surge in tax liability on the farming sector will cause widespread bankruptcy. Agrarians accuse the government of punishing the sector and failing to recognize its importance within the British economy.

Critics of the government’s policy maintain that the agricultural sector has for too long possessed disproportionately paltry revenues and used this to support the argument that it should be attributed extra financial support. They have also criticized the reduced tax rate as a mere band-aid that will do little in terms of alleviating the problems already affecting farmers, including growing land costs and inadequate access to markets. The governmental legislation has already become contentious with farmer associations who have warned that they will employ various methods to counteract the changes they have deemed unconstructive.

As parliament starts to tackle the issue, the sentiments of the agricultural sector will need to be taken into consideration by the government. It is key to ensure that the government appreciates the fears and concerns of the farm industry, and balances this with the need to levy tax on inherited assets equitably

Read the full article from The BBC here: Read More