The real-life inspiration for the character of Martha in the Netflix series “Baby Reindeer” has spoken out about the amount of money she received for appearing on Piers Morgan’s show. Fiona Harvey, who has confirmed that she is the basis for the stalker character in the show and made her first television appearance last week, criticised Morgan and lamented the low fee she received for the interview. She was paid £250 but claimed that she had not signed a contract for the interview and did not believe that the payment was adequate. Harvey told the Daily Record in Scotland that she had asked if all guests received this fee but no documentation had been produced demonstrating that this was the case.
Aside from her concerns about payment, Harvey also criticised the show’s overall narrative. She denied that she had attacked Richard Gadd, destroyed the bar he worked in, contacted his parents or stalked him in any way. In the interview with Morgan, she revealed that she was considering taking legal action against both Gadd and Netflix. Morgan himself later claimed that he believed Harvey may have misrepresented herself several times during the interview.
Although Harvey may have some cause for complaint, she has become something of a cause célèbre. Indeed, the publicity surrounding her successful stalking of Gadd appears to have only served to draw more attention to the series: “Baby Reindeer” has become a cultural phenomenon, attracting widespread media attention and praise from critics. Created by the comedian Richard Gadd, the semi-autobiographical series tells the “true story” of a struggling stand-up who is maliciously stalked by an older woman named Martha. The show’s success is largely based on the powerful performances of Gadd and other actors.
But there are concerns about the show’s impact on real-life events. Harvey has accused the makers of creating a false narrative and seizing on the case of her stalking Gadd. While it is clear that Harvey has been subjected to unwanted attention, it is unclear to what extent this supports her claims about the show.
The controversy surrounding the series reflects a wider anxiety about the ways in which real-life stories are told. Often, events are embellished or distorted in order to make them more dramatic, or to suit a particular agenda. This can leave victims feeling exploited and unsupported. While there is no definitive solution to this problem, greater care needs to be taken when creating and adapting material drawn from real-life sources.
Read the full article on NME here: Read More